Encounters in the wild
By Kumran Sathasivam
Reports of leopards wandering into human areas are not particularly
uncommon in our newspapers. Some cases that spring to mind include the
leopard that fell into a well and was subsequently beaten to death in
Guwahati; the solitary leopard, panther i f you will, that wandered
around in Vandalur zoo in Chennai after dark; the leopards of Borivli
that were reported to have attacked humans.
Adaptable species
But there are many instances of leopards falling into wells or even
wandering into buildings in towns or villages, far away from forests.
It is as though these animals were reminding us that they are an
adaptable and widespread species. In the words of Prater, "panthers
are able to live and thrive almost anywhere. They are not restricted
to forests or heavy cover like tigers, and thrive as well in open
country as among rocks and scrub".
It is all very well to say that leopards can live in a variety of
habitats; if they are widespread, why do we not see them more often?
The answer clearly has much to do with what Jerdon says, citing Blyth:
"The pard is a particularly silent creature, very stealthy, and will
contrive to dodge and hide itself in places where it would appear
impossible that a creature of its size could find concealment".
So if leopards live around us without our knowledge, what do they eat?
Large animals need substantial fare to sustain them, don't they? Not
really. Leopards are unlike tigers in that they do not rely as much as
the latter on large prey species. Prater again: "The panther will kill
and eat anything it can overpower with safety, cattle, deer and
monkeys, the smaller beasts, and larger rodents, like porcupines."
Significantly, "the bill of fare is extended to include birds,
reptiles and crabs."
On the one hand, the leopard is by disposition a reserved creature,
inclined to lead an existence away from human scrutiny. On the other
hand, man maintains various domestic animals in his settlements, and
the leopard, with its catholic diet, is not averse to helping itself.
It is almost as if there were two personalities in the leopard, two
species. Interestingly, before Prater, in the 19th century and into
the early 20th century, various authorities recognised as two species
or at least two forms what is believed today to be one species, the
leopard.
The larger one was said to be lighter in colour; this second form was
described as having comparatively shorter legs and a rounder head. The
names leopard and panther were used to distinguish the two. Notably
some British sportsmen and native shikaris also noticed a difference
in their behaviour. One form was different from the other: it did not
confine itself to forests but would roam fearlessly among villages,
seizing domestic animals with audacity.
The Hindu: 14th October 2007